| |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
Australian
Indigenous HealthBulletin
Vol 5 No 1 January 2005 - March 2005: ISSN 1445-7253 A peer-reviewed electronic journal from the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet Journal articles
This section of the Bulletin identifies recent journal articles. If you are aware of any journal articles that would be appropriate for inclusion in this section please contact us.
Adams K, Dixon T, Guthrie J (2004) Brough M, Bond C, Hunt J (2004) Campbell S, Brown S (2004) Objective: To assess and contrast views and experiences of women attending the Women's Business Service at the Mildura Aboriginal Health Service with those of rural women attending public maternity services who participated in a Victorian statewide survey conducted in 2000. Methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with clients of the Women's Business Service (n=25) using a structured interview schedule based on the Victorian Survey of Recent Mothers 2000. Comparisons were made with rural women who had participated in the 2000 survey and had received public care for their pregnancy (n=333). Results: Compared with rural participants in the 2000 survey, women who attended the Women's Business Service were significantly more likely to say care providers kept them informed (OR 20.63, 95% CI 3.27-853.75), midwives were never rushed during check-ups (OR 22.24, 95% CI 3.50-921.47), and to say they were happy with medical care (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.68-30.67). Eighty per cent of interview participants described their antenatal care as 'very good'. Fewer women rated intrapartum care (64%) or postnatal hospital care (43%) as 'very good'. Compared with rural participants in the statewide survey, women attending the Women's Business Service were significantly more confident about looking after their baby in the first week at home (OR 9.08, 95% CI 2.95-37.01), and less likely to want additional help or advice (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.73). Conclusions: Women using the Women's Business Service were significantly more positive about many aspects of their care than women attending other rural public maternity services. The study lends support to the view that Aboriginal community-controlled health services are well placed to provide appropriate and accessible care to Indigenous women. Abstract reproduced with permission of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (view website) Carson BE, Bailie RS (2004) Objective: To identify areas of relative need and inform future planning of health workforce and health services in discrete Indigenous communities. Method: Descriptive analysis of relevant variables from the 1999 Community Housing and Infrastructure Needs Survey (CHINS), including all discrete Indigenous communities in Australia. Results: Almost 90% of the Indigenous population of the Northern Territory live in discrete communities. The corresponding figure for Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia is around 25%, for New South Wales 8% and Victoria 1%. Just over 4,000 people (5% of the population surveyed) live 100 kilometres or more from the nearest community health centre and almost 60,000 (54%) live 100 kilometres or more from the nearest hospital. Approximately 4,000 Indigenous people (6% of population surveyed) have little or no access to a registered nurse or a doctor in their community. Access to Indigenous health workers is also limited, with more than 26,000 people (40%) having almost no access to a male Indigenous health worker and about 10,400 (16%) having almost no access to a female Indigenous health worker. More than 13,000 people (20%) have no access to a dentist and many thousands (30-50%) have no access to allied health or mental health care workers. An obstetrician or ENT/respiratory physician never visited the communities of almost 40,000 people (55% and 59%, respectively) and about 24,000 people (36%) have no access to an ophthalmologist. Conclusion: CHINS data provide a unique source of information to monitor the status of health services and the workforce in discrete Indigenous communities. Abstract reproduced with permission of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (view website) Carter E, Lumley J, Wilson G, Bell S
(2004) Objective: To describe the process, findings and limitations of a review of Congress Alukura commissioned in 1998. Methods: Analysis of documents and reports, service use and perinatal data from Alukura and the Northern Territory Midwives Collection; interviews with staff of Congress Alukura, of Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, of Aboriginal community organisations in Alice Springs and remote communities, of health care providers and other key informants in Alice Springs; community consultations through women's meetings or group discussions in local and remote communities. Interviews were coded for thematic and content analysis. Results: Client visits increased by 42% from 1995/96 (2,130) to 1997/98. The proportion of women having a first trimester antenatal visit increased from 23% (1986-88) to 38% (1993-95). Mean birthweight of Aboriginal infants in the Alice Springs urban area was 3,168 g in 1986-90, 3,271 g in 1991-95, and 3,268 g in 1996-99. Other primary and maternity care providers perceived the quality of care to be high and saw Alukura playing a key role through transport, liaison, screening and follow-up. Alukura was much less successful in its role as a place for birth. Expectations of additional outreach by local and remote communities were high. Discussion: The review's limitations included: a lack of direct input from young women, the main users of Alukura; a timeframe that precluded the detailed discussion necessary for seeking access to medical records, and the need for interpreters in community settings. Current and former staff who participated in the review often had other important community roles. Developments since the review are discussed briefly. Abstract reproduced with permission of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (view website) Couzos S (2004) Dance P, Brown R, Bammer G, Sibthorpe B
(2004) Objective: To ascertain and meet current and anticipated needs for residential care and other services by older Indigenous people in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and region. Methods: With advice from a reference group, qualitative and quantitative data were gathered from 98 older (45 years and over) Indigenous people in the ACT and region during 1999/2000. Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers worked closely throughout all phases of the research. We helped participants with immediate problems identified during the interviews and worked directly with the Government funding body to implement the findings. Results: No one expressed a current need for residential services. In terms of future needs, 50% of respondents favoured an arrangement where an existing mainstream provider of aged care accommodated a cluster of Indigenous people in the same facility as non-Indigenous people. Thirty-two per cent preferred an Indigenous-run organisation. Our study also revealed a broad range of health problems and needs. Assessment using the Resident Classification Scale showed that 70% required a low level of care and 4% needed a high level of care. Conclusion: The research identified the needs and provided a health profile of older Indigenous people in the ACT and region. This then provided policymakers with evidence on which they acted to provide appropriate aged care services. Implications: Collaboration between Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers can access high-quality information, and partnership between researchers and policymakers can improve Indigenous services. Abstract reproduced with permission of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (view website) Durie M (2004) Gilchrist D, Woods B, Binns CW, Gracey M, Scott
J, Smith H (2004) Jackson Pulver LR, Fitzpatrick SA (2004) Lowenthal RM, Grogan PB, Kerrins ET (2005) Mark A, McLeod I, Booker J, Ardler C
(2004) Murphy L, Kordyl P, Thorne M (2004) Speare R, Durrheim DN (2004) Talley NJ (2005) Vindigni DR, Parkinson L, Blunden S, Perkins J,
Rivett DA, Walker BF (2004) Wang Z, Hoy WE (2005) Windsor HM, Abioye-Kuteyi EA, Leber JM, Morrow
SD, Bulsara MK, Marshall BJ (2005) Wood FM, Fowler BV, McAullay D, Jones JR (2005)
| |||
|
|
|||
| © Copyright 2001 - Disclaimer & privacy - Webmaster |
Last updated: 1 June, 2005 |