Australian Indigenous HealthBulletin
Vol 4 No 4 October 2004 - December 2004: ISSN 1445-7253

A peer-reviewed electronic journal from the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet


Reviews


Return to reviews home

This section of the Bulletin contains peer reviewed general summaries of Indigenous health and reviews of specific topics. If you would like to contribute to this section, please see Notes for contributors or contact us.



A review of the literature on disability services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples




This review is also available as a downloadable PDF using Adobe Acrobat.

Suggested citation:  O'Neill M, Kirov E, Thomson N (2004) A review of the literature on disability services for Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples. Australian Indigenous HealthBulletin;4(4): Reviews 2. Retrieved [access date] from
http://www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/html/html_bulletin//bull_44/reviews/oneill/reviews_oneill_1.htm



 

Summary

Little is known about the actual burden of disability experienced by Indigenous people Australia, but it is likely to be considerably greater that that experienced by other Australians.xxiii

Similarly, there are no firm data about the extent to which the use of disability support services by Indigenous people reflects their burden of disability. Indirect estimates of the use of disability support services by Indigenous people suggests that as many as one-third of Indigenous people with a disability may not be taking advantage of the services available. Even if this estimate is not entirely accurate, there is a substantial body of evidence suggesting that disability support services are neither as available nor as accessible to Indigenous people as they should be.xxiv

The factors contributing to Indigenous use – or non-use – of disability support services are complex, ranging from differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in attitudes to disability to racism among service providers. The literature suggests that many Indigenous people view a disability within a holistic perception of wellbeing – effectively occupying a part of a continuum from perfect wellbeing to death. This is, of course, very much in line with current international approaches, which focus on activity limitations and participation restrictions rather than on a disability per se.

Reflecting this perspective, caring for a person with a disability is generally seen by Indigenous people as the responsibility of the family and immediate kin, with only people with a severe disability being seen as the responsibility of 'welfare'.

Caring for a person with a disability is not straightforward for Indigenous families (or for non-Indigenous families), of course, and various support services can play a valuable role. These include general and disability support services. The relative poverty of many Indigenous people has major implications for many aspects of daily living, including housing and associated facilities, and transportation. The relatively low level of vehicle ownership – coupled with limited or no access to public transport – poses great difficulties for many Indigenous people in accessing general and disability support services.

For many Indigenous people, particularly those living in remote parts of the country, the real problem is the lack – or very limited availability – of general and disability support services. This aspect has been identified for therapy services, home help and personal care, specialised disability services (including equipment services), and respite services, for example.

Even if services are available, many Indigenous people with a disability and/or their families experience substantial difficulties in accessing general and disability support services. These difficulties include:

  • differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in understandings and values – this can result in service providers making unwarranted assumptions on behalf of or about Indigenous clients and/or following culturally inappropriate procedures, and in overt discrimination and racism;
  • language barriers – these may lead to misunderstandings between service providers and Indigenous people, particularly those living in remote areas, unless translators are used; and
  • poor coordination between services agencies and between levels of government.

Some services, despite being accessible to Indigenous people, experience issues related to staffing. These issues, which impact on service quality and are more common for services in remote areas, include:

  • recruitment and retention of appropriately trained staff;
  • inadequate orientation and training of staff for work with Indigenous people;
  • insufficient Indigenous staff.

The issues summarised in this review should contribute to raising awareness about the needs of Indigenous people with disabilities and the unique issues that influence their access to disability support services. The review provides a sound basis for the development of culturally responsive disability policy and services for Indigenous people.

Return to top

 

Endnotes

 

i An appendix summarising disability concepts, the assessment of disability, and the provision of disability support services in Australia is provided for readers who are not familiar with these areas.
ii The report from the IDAR Project has been provided to the DCS, and a version is due for publication in early 2005.
iii Grey literature was defined at the Fourth International Conference on Grey Literature as 'that which is produced on all levels of government, academics, business and industry in print and electronic formats, but which is not controlled by commercial publishers' [96, 97]. The grey literature may include: reports (progress and advanced reports, technical reports, statistical reports, etc.), theses, conference proceedings, technical specifications and standards, non-commercial translations, bibliographies, technical and commercial documentation, and official documents not published commercially (primarily government reports and documents).
iv It was recognised that identification and collection of the grey literature is an ongoing process, which needs to continue beyond the timeframe of this review.
v For example, the bibliography of a journal article or grey literature item may include reference to an unpublished report, a copy of which may be available as a PDF document on the Internet.
vi Despite definite similarities, there was enormous diversity in cultural and technological aspects in environments ranging from dense rainforests to deserts [92]. The fact that there were some 200–250 different Australian Indigenous languages (and even more dialects), gives some indication of the great diversity that existed in Australia prior to 1788. This diversity is reflected in the great heterogeneity of Indigenous people in Australia today.
vii Such practices were not uncommon in hunter-gatherer societies, being recognised as a part of the balance between individual and societal rights.
viii The people refer to themselves as Anangu.
ix 'Participation restriction’ or ‘activity limitation’ using current terminology.
x The study did not include Indigenous people living in institutions.
xi As is the case with most statistics derived from administrative data collections, the identification of Indigenous people is likely to be incomplete in these data. As well as the 5% of cases in which Indigenous status was not stated, it is almost certain that in some records Indigenous people have been incorrectly identified as non- Indigenous. Thus, the CSDA data almost certainly underestimate the actual use of disability support services by Indigenous people.
xii Not only is there uncertainty about the actual extent and nature of disability among Indigenous people (see the section entitled ‘The pattern of disability among Indigenous people’), there are major problems in assessing the use of disability support services by Indigenous (and by non-Indigenous) people. It is beyond the scope of this report to explore these issues in detail. Interested readers should refer to reports from the AIHW, which is working actively on the development of better information. To gain an accurate measure of the relative use of disability support services by Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, it is necessary to adjust the usage figures according to need, as has been attempted here. This estimate of use based on need is quite speculative because it assumes (1) the numbers of disability support services used on the snapshot day are representative of the overall use of services; (2) the estimates of disability prevalence for Indigenous people living in the Taree area of New South Wales can be extrapolated across the country; and (3) the proportions of people identified as disabled who actually need disability support services is the same for the Indigenous population of Taree and the total population. These are major assumptions, but, in the absence of any other estimates of the extent to which Indigenous people are taking advantage of the disability support services that are available, they appear justified.
xiii The terms ‘remote’ and ‘very remote’ are those used by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in measures of ‘remoteness’, added recently to the Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) [94, 95]. They are two of the five categories of remoteness, which, based largely on the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA), express the remoteness of a location in terms of the road distance to the perimeter of an urban centre (where various health and human services are available). Defined according to the ARIA value of their ABS Census collection districts (CDs), the five categories are: ‘major cities’ (average ARIA value of 0-0.2); ‘inner regional’ (average ARIA value > 0.2 and <= 2.4); ‘outer regional’ (average ARIA value > 2.4 and <= 5.92); ‘remote’ (average ARIA value > 5.92 and <= 10.53); and ‘very remote’ (average ARIA value > 10.53).
xiv About three-quarters of these people also reported speaking English well or very well.
xv Australian Indigenous languages included the various creole languages: ones that have developed out of some amalgamation of the language native to an area and the introduced language (English). Because they are linguistically different from creole languages in other parts of the world, those of the northern Australian mainland are known as Kriol [93]. The language in the Torres Strait is most commonly referred to as Torres Strait creole.
xvi The proportion of these people who speak English ‘well’ or ‘very well’ was not reported.
xvii Aboriginal English comprises a continuum of dialects ranging from close to Standard Australian English through to close to the creole languages.
xviii It is beyond the scope of this report to explore the various definitions of poverty, and to present detailed data about poverty among Indigenous people. Instead, the report accepts the conclusion of a recent Australian Senate inquiry: ‘on all the standard indicators of poverty and disadvantage, Indigenous people emerge as the most socially and economically deprived’ 54 Senate Community Affairs References Committee [54, p301]
xix As noted in the introductory comments to this section, the word ‘available’ is used to mean that the services are present in a particular area. The term ‘accessible’ is used in a broader sense to mean both the geographic availability of the service and the lack any barriers to use of the service.
xx The Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) is used to assist in the planning and assessment of access to health-related services for people living in regional, rural and remote locations.
xxi At the time, the cost of diesel fuel in Adelaide, the closest capital city, was around 73 cents. And, of course, expensive four-wheel drive vehicles are essential in these remote areas.
xxii An example of trying to ‘make things work’ in relation to Indigenous ‘breaches’ of social security regulations (due largely to failure to respond to mailed correspondence) is the suggestion by social security administrators in the Northern Territory of allowing Indigenous people to be ‘physical check-in’ or ‘no correspondence’ clients if they wished [76, p6-7]
xxiii The burden of disability – in terms of prevalence and types – was not a focus of this review, but clearly any thorough approach to addressing the needs of Indigenous people with disabilities requires much firmer baseline data than are available at present.
xxiv As noted earlier in this report, 'available' means that a service is present in a particular area, while 'accessible' means both the availability of a service and the lack any barriers to its use.
xxv For an historical overview, see [26, pp266–279]
xxvi Bilateral agreements between the Commonwealth and each of the states and territories are being negotiated and will aim to improve the interface between employment services and community access services.
xxvii Services for people with a disability aged 65 years or older are provided largely through the Home and Community Care (HACC) program or as a part of the services in residential aged care.
xxviii Since July 2002 CRS Australia has operated as a business unit within the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing.
xxix A similar strategy was successful in Canada in 2001.

 

Return to top

References


1. Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services (2003) Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement. Retrieved 5 December 2003 from http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/via/csda/$file/csda.pdf

2. National Disability Advisory Council (2003) End of second term report, 1999-2003. Retrieved 14 April 2004 from http://www.facs.gov.au/disability/ood/ndac/eot_report2003/FINAL_End_of_Second_Term_R eport_Dec_2003.pdf

3. Ariotti LJ (1997) 'The newly planted tree': an exploration of Anangu perceptions of disability. Unpublished Degree of Master Science (Primary Health Care), Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide

4. Ariotti L (1999) Social construction of Anangu disability. Australian Journal of Rural Health;7(4):216-222

5. Susman J (1994) Disability, stigma and deviance. Social Science and Medicine;38(15-22)

6. Mobbs R (1991) In sickness and health: the sociocultural context of Aboriginal well-being, illness and healing. In: Reid J, Trompf P, eds. The health of Aboriginal Australia. Marrickville, NSW: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Group [Australia] Pty Ltd:292-325

7. Reid J (1983) Sorcerers and healing spirits: continuity and change in an Aboriginal medical system. Canberra: Australian National University Press

8. Berndt RM, Berndt CH (1985) The world of the first Australians. Fourth ed. Adelaide, SA: Rigby

9. Elliot D (1984) Aboriginal perceptions of disability and the formulation of an appropriate method of providing rehabilitation services to clients on remote communities. (Pilot Paper, No 1) Darwin: Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service

10. Whyte SR, Ingstad B (1995) Disability and culture: an overview. In: Ingstad B, Whyre SR, eds. Disability and culture. Berkeley, CA University of California Press:3-32

11. Maher P (1998) The provision of rehabilitation services to Aboriginal people; a qualitative case study. Unpublished Master of Applied Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide

12. Armstrong MJ, Fitzgerald MH (1996) Culture and disability studies; an anthropological perspective. Rehabilitation Education;10:247-304

13. Senior KA (2000) Testing the ICIDH-2 with Indigenous Australians: results of field work in two Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory. Wollongong: University of Wollongong

14. Gething L, Poynter T, Redmayne G, Reynolds F (1994) Across the divide: distance, diversity and disability. Sydney: University of Sydney

15. Gething L (1995) A case study of Australian Aboriginal people with disabilities. Australian Disability Review;2:77-87

16. Gething L (1997) Sources of double disadvantage for people with disabilities living in remote and rural areas of New South Wales, Australia. Disability and Society;12(4):513-531

17. Smeaton T (1996) A voice for all: advocacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with a disability. Sydney: Disability Services Aboriginal Corporation, Department of Health and Family Services

18. Smeaton T (1998) Family dreaming: support programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People with disabilities. Sydney: NSW Ageing and Disability Department

19. Victorian Aboriginal Community Services Association (2000) Meeting the needs of Koori people with a disability:developing and implementing strategies for improving equity and access. Fitzroy: Victorian Aboriginal Community Services Association Limited

20. Danelluti M (2000) Meeting the needs of Koori people with a disability: developing and implementing strategies for improving service equity and access. Victoria: Department of Human Services

21. O'Neill M (1994) Disability, Aboriginality and service provision in Western Australia. Unpublished Master of Arts, Murdoch University, Perth

22. Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service (1994) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander resource kit. Canberra: Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service

23. NACCHO (2002) About us. Retrieved 26 March from http://www.naccho.org.au/

24. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999) Disability, ageing and carers: summary of findings. (Cat no. 4430.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

25. World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization

26. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2003) Australia's Welfare 2003: the fifth biennial welfare report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

27. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1999) Australia's welfare 1999: the third biennial welfare report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

28. Thomson N, Snow C (1994) Disability and handicap among Aborigines of the Taree area of New South Wales. (9) Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

29. Thomson N (1998) The Taree study - a model for Indigenous disability research. Indigenous disability data: current status and future prospects. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

30. Ngaanyatjarra Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women's Council (1995) Uwankaraku meeting. Alice Springs: Ngaanyatjarra, Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women's Council and the Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service

31. Woenne-Green S (1995) They might have to drag me like a bullock - the Tjilpi Pampa Tjutaku project. Alice Springs: Ngaanyatjarra, Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women's Council

32. Stokes M (1988) We the forgotten elders: an overview of Aboriginal aged needs in the Perth metropolitan area. Perth: West Australian Council on the Ageing

33. Senior K (1998) A survey of critical unmet need of people with severe disabilities in the Northern Territory. Darwin: Mental Health, Aged and Disability Services Epidemiology and Statistical Branch Territory Health Services Northern Territory Government

34. Ngaanyatjarra Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women's Council (1994) The disability support project: progress report. Alice Springs: Ngaanyatjarra, Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women's Council

35. London J (1999) Review of the Disability Services Act 1993 (NSW) and the Community Services (Complaints, Appeals and Monitoring) Act 1993 (NSW): Consultations. (Research Report 9) Sydney, NSW: NSW Law Reform Commission

36. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2003) Population characteristics, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, Australia 2001. (4713.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

37. Burns J, Thomson N (2003) Disability. In: Thomson N, ed. The health of Indigenous Australians. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press:467-487

38. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) Information paper: ABS Views on Remoteness, 2001. (Cat. no. 1244.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

39. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) Information paper: Outcomes of ABS views on remoteness consultation, Australia. (Cat. no. 1244.0.00.001) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

40. House of Representatives Standing Committee Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (2001) We can do it! The needs of urban dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia

41. Tipper D, Dovey S (1991) Bringing the act together: the disability services act and the support needs of Aboriginal people: case studies of service provision in western NSW. Sydney: Planning and Research Unit, NSW Technical and Further Education Commission

42. National Disability Advisory Council (1999) Influencing the outcomes of change: end of term report. Canberra: National Disability Advisory Council

43. Morgan DL, Slade MD, Morgan CMA (1997) Aboriginal philosophy and its impact on health care outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health;21(6):597-601

44. Barker R (1997) Linking with community development: an outsider working in remote Aboriginal communities of Central Australia. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide

45. Gething L (1994) Aboriginality and disability. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal;18(3):29-34

46. Bostock L (1991) Access and equity for the doubly disadvantaged. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal;15(4):10-15

47. Curry R (1993) Needs assessment report. People with handicaps and the frail aged in five Aboriginal communities. Darwin: Department of Health Housing and Community Services

48. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2003) Population characteristics: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. (4713.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

49. Kaldor S, Malcolm IG (1991) Aboriginal English - an overview. In: Romaine S, ed. Language in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

50. Milne F, De Mellow A (1996) The housing and care needs of Aboriginal people with developmental disabilities and aged carers. Balmain Uniting Research Unit

51. Henderson I (1993) Remote area Aboriginal ear and hearing health: Who defines the problem? Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal;17(4):19-21

52. Maher P (1999) Disability in the Australian Aboriginal population. Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange;5(3):10-20

53. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (2003) Disability Discrimination Act Inquiry: submission from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC). Retrieved 20 November 2003 from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/dda/subs/sub059.pdf

54. Senate Community Affairs References Committee (2004) A hand up not a hand out: renewing the fight against poverty. Report on poverty and financial hardship. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia

55. Curry R (1999) Allied health therapy services in aged and disability care in remote Aboriginal Communities of the Northern Territory: a framework for quality service provision. Darwin: Top End Division of General Practice

56. Mokak R (1997) Aboriginal people with a disability: what are the issues and where do we go from here? Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal;21(5):14-15

57. Smeaton T (1995) Advocacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability. Disability Services Aboriginal Corporation

58. Willis R (1985) Otitis media and the Australian Aboriginal. Am J Otol;6(4):316-22

59. Young E (1990) Aboriginal population mobility and service provisions: a framework for analysis. In: Meehan B, White N, eds. Hunter-gatherer demography: past and present. Sydney: University of Sydney:186-196

60. Taylor J (1996) Short-term Indigenous population mobility and service delivery. (Discussion paper no. 118) Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic and Policy Research

61. Young E, Doohan K (1989) Mobility for survival: a process analysis of Aboriginal population movement in central Australia. Darwin: ANU North Australia Research Unit

62. Taylor J, Bell M (1999) Changing places: Indigenous population movement in the 1990s. (Discussion paper no. 189) Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic and Policy Research

63. Glynn R (1996) Too late tomorrow: exploring community based rehabilitation. Darwin: Territory Health Services

64. Jacobs A (1994) Healthy ears hear better: Aboriginal teacher's manual. Alice Springs: Territory Health Services

65. Leipoldt E (1998) Aboriginal people with disability and their use of advocacy: a phenomenological approach. Unpublished Honour's Dissertation, Edith Cowan University Western Australia, Perth

66. Mokak R (1999) Indigenous peoples and the HACC program. Paper presented at the International Homecare & HACC Australia Conference 29 March - 1 April, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre

67. Commonwealth Department of Family & Community Services (1999) National Disability Advocacy Program: Review report. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Family & Community Services

68. Commonwealth Grants Commission (2002) Isolation: Discussion paper CGC 2002/43. Retrieved 20 November 2003 from http://www.cgc.gov.au/State_Downloads/Discussion/R2004/CGC_2002-43_Isolation.pdf

69. Paddy M, Ducasse E, Arch M, McManus D (1999) Developing a service for older people in a remote Aboriginal community: Nganampa Health Council aged and disability care program. Paper presented at the International Homecare & HACC Australia Conference 29 March-1 April 1999, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre

70. Walker J (1996) One year of the remote areas disabilities brokerage. Alice Springs: Central Australian Family Resource Centre

71. Commonwealth Department of Family & Community Services (2000) Commonwealth disability strategy. A strategic framework for inclusion and participation by people with disabilities in Government policies, programs and services. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia

72. Sidoti C (2000) The national inquiry into rural and remote school education. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission

73. Illin E (1990) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in the Townsville region in conjunction with the Aboriginal rehabilitation officer and the Commonwealth rehabilitation service. Australian Disability Review;3:20-21

74. Glynn R (1993) Some perspectives on cross-cultural rehabilitation with remote area Aboriginal people. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal;40(4):159-162

75. Smeaton T (1997) Support services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability. Disability Services Aboriginal Corporation

76. Sanders W (2001) Indigenous Australians and the rules of the social security system: universalism, appropriateness and justice. (Discussion paper no. 212/2001) Canberra: ANU Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research

77 HACC (1992) Remote areas disability brokerage disability /advocacy service in NT. Community aged care package for people in the bush Waltja model Aboriginal and TSI Access to HACC 1992.

78. Sara J, Couzic D (1991) Rehabilitation restoring purpose, place and pride. 30 April-3 May, Melbourne

79. Ziersch T (1990) The reintegration of Aboriginal children with significant physical disabilities into remote communities. Australian Disability Review;3:24-30

80. Barker R (1993) Services for disabled people in the cross border region of the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia. An unpublished report to Nganampa Health Council

81. Pedersen A, Griffiths B, Contos N, Bishop B, Walker I (2000) Attitudes towards Aboriginal Australians in city and country settings. Australian Psychologist;35(2):109-117

82. Bickenbach JE, Somnath C, Badley EM, Ustin TB (1999) Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine;48:1173-1187

83. Madden R (1998) Disability definitions and concepts: working towards national consistency. In: Australian Bureau of Statistics and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, ed. Indigenous disability data - current status and future prospects: report on proceedings of the Canberra workshop, April 1988. Canberra: Australian Institute for Health and Welfare:58-63

84. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2002) Australia's Health 2002. The eighth biennial report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (AIHW Cat. No. AUS 25) Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

85. Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement (2004) Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the States and Territories of Australia in relation to disability services. Retrieved 25 March 2004 from http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/VIA/cstda/$File/cstda_2002-2007.pdf

86. Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (2004) Report on government services, 2004. Canberra: Productivity Commission

87. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2002) Disability support services 2002: First national results on services provided under the CSDA. from http://www.aihw.gov.au

88. Australian Disability Services (1993) Service Consumer Profile Report. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health

89. Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services (2003) National Disability Advisory Council. Retrieved 5 December 2003 from
http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/aboutfacs/programs/disability-ndac.htm

90. Physical Disability Council of Australia (2004) Australian Federation of Disability Organisations (AFDO). Retrieved 17 January 2004 from http://www.pdca.org.au/AusFedOfDisability.html

91. Howson CP, Fineberg HV, Bloom BR (1998) The pursuit of global health: the relevance of engagement for developed countries. The Lancet;351(9180):586-590

92. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (1999) As a matter of fact: answering the myths and misconceptions about Indigenous Australians. Retrieved 5 March 2004 from http://www.atsic.gov.au/news_room/As_a_Matter_of_Fact/matterfact.pdf

93 Amery R, Bourke C (1998) Australian languages: our heritage. In: Bourke C, Bourke E, Edwards B, eds. Aboriginal Australia : an introductory reader in Aboriginal studies. Second ed. St Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press

94 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) Information paper: ABS Views on Remoteness, 2001. (Cat. no. 1244.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

95. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) Information paper: Outcomes of ABS views on remoteness consultation, Australia. (Cat. no. 1244.0.00.001) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

96. New York Academy of Medicine (2002) What is grey literature? Retrieved 9 December 2002 from http://www.nyam.org/library/greylit/whatis.shtml

97. New York Academy of Medicine (2002) Grey Literature Report. Retrieved 9 December 2002 from http://www.nyam.org/library/greylit/glrindex.shtml

 

Return to top

Previous Page | Next page

 

 

If you are aware of any material that is appropriate for inclusion in the Bulletin
or if you would like to contribute, please contact us.
   © Copyright 2001 - Disclaimer & privacy - Webmaster

Last updated: 23 February, 2005