Skip to content
There is a clear relationship between the social disadvantages experienced by Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people and their current health status . These social disadvantages, directly related to dispossession and characterised by poverty and powerlessness, are reflected in measures of education, employment, and income. Before presenting the key indicators of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health status, it is important to provide a brief summary of the context within which these indicators should be considered.
Indigenous peoples generally enjoyed better health in 17881 than most people living in Europe . They did not suffer from smallpox, measles, influenza, tuberculosis, scarlet fever, venereal syphilis and gonorrhoea, diseases that were common in 18th century Europe. Indigenous people probably suffered from hepatitis B, some bacterial infections (including a non-venereal form of syphilis and yaws) and some intestinal parasites. Trauma is likely to have been a major cause of death, and anaemia, arthritis, periodontal disease, and tooth attrition are known to have occurred. The impact of these diseases at a population level was relatively small compared with the effects of the diseases that affected 18th century Europe.
All of this changed after 1788 with the arrival of introduced illness from non-Indigenous people, initially smallpox and sexually transmissible infections (gonorrhoea and venereal syphilis), and later tuberculosis, influenza, measles, scarlet fever, and whooping cough . These diseases, particularly smallpox, caused considerable loss of life among Indigenous populations, but the impacts were not restricted to the immediate victims. The epidemic also affected the fabric of Indigenous societies through depopulation and social disruption.
The impact of introduced diseases was almost certainly the major cause of death for Indigenous people, but direct conflict and occupation of Indigenous homelands by non-Indigenous people also contributed substantially to Indigenous mortality . The initial responses of Indigenous people to the arrival of the First Fleet were apparently quite peaceful. It didn't take long, however, before conflict started to occur - initially over access to fish stocks and then over access to other resources as non-Indigenous people started to plant crops and introduce livestock. This pattern of conflict was almost certainly widespread as non-Indigenous people spread across the country.
Conflict escalated in many places, in some instances resulting in overt massacres of Indigenous people. The 1838 massacre at Myall Creek (near Inverell, NSW) is the most infamous , but less well-known massacres occurred across Australia . As Bruce Elder notes, as 'painful and shameful as they are', the massacres 'should be as much a part of Australian history as the First Fleet, the explorers, the gold rushes and the bushrangers' (, p.vi).
Prior to 1788, Indigenous people were able to define their own sense of being through control over all aspects of their lives, including ceremonies, spiritual practices, medicine, social relationships, management of land, law, and economic activities . In addition to the impacts of introduced diseases and conflict, the spread of non-Indigenous peoples undermined the ability of Indigenous people to lead healthy lives by devaluing their culture, destroying their traditional food base, separating families, and dispossessing whole communities . This loss of autonomy undermined social vitality, which, in turn, affected the capacity to meet challenges, including health challenges; a cycle of dispossession, demoralisation, and poor health was established.
These impacts on Indigenous populations eventually forced colonial authorities to try to 'protect' remaining Indigenous peoples. This pressure led to the establishment of Aboriginal 'protection' boards, the first established in Vic by the Aboriginal Protection Act of 1869 . A similar Act established the NSW Aborigines Protection Board in 1883, with the other colonies also enacting legislation to 'protect' Indigenous populations within their boundaries. The 'protection' provided under the provisions of the various Acts imposed enormous restrictions on the lives of many Indigenous people. These restrictions meant that, as late as 1961, in eastern Australia 'nearly one-third of all Australians recorded as being of Aboriginal descent lived in settlements' (, p.4).
The provisions of the Acts were also used to justify the forced separation of Indigenous children from their families 'by compulsion, duress or undue influence' (, p.2). The National Inquiry into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families concluded that 'between one-in-three and one-in-ten Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families and communities in the period from approximately 1910 until 1970' (, p.31). It was the 1960s, at the earliest, when the various 'protection' Acts were either repealed or became inoperative.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people(s) are the original inhabitants of the country. Aboriginal people are distinctively different ethnically and culturally from Torres Strait Islander people .
Aboriginal people in Australia are recognised as one of the oldest living cultures in the world with estimates ranging from 50,000 to 120,000 years . Aboriginal people occupied mainland and some surrounding islands of what is now Australia. They enjoyed a semi nomadic lifestyle in family or community groups. Around 260 language groups coexisted each with their own customs and cultural practices.
Torres Strait Islander peoples have lived on the 270 or so islands in the Straits between Australia and Papua New Guinea for approximately 2,500 years . Today they live on 17 of the islands with two communities on the far northern Queensland coast. Community life was based on hunting fishing, gardening and trading. Being located in the Straits they have traditionally had close contact with Papuan New Guinean communities and Australian Aboriginal communities.
Despite their differences they have many shared experiences since colonisation including dispossession, marginalisation and racism, and the Stolen Generations, that have a significant impact on health outcomes to the present day. For many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people the use of language to describe them individually and collectively is linked directly to the enduring experiences of colonisation and dispossession . Language was used to promulgate the practices of subjugation and was based in racist ideologies. The HealthInfoNet has a publically declared commitment to use appropriate and non-offensive terminology when referring to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people(s) in all published materials.
The health disadvantages experienced by Indigenous people can be considered historical in origin , but perpetuation of the disadvantages owes much to contemporary structural and social factors, embodied in what have been termed the 'social determinants' of health . In broad terms, economic opportunity, physical infrastructure, and social conditions influence the health of individuals, communities, and societies as a whole. These factors are specifically manifest in measures such as education, employment, income, housing, access to services, social networks, connection with land, racism, and incarceration. On all these measures, Indigenous people suffer substantial disadvantage. For many Indigenous people, the ongoing effects of 'protection' and the forced separation of children from their families compound other social disadvantages.
It is also important in considering Indigenous health to understand how Indigenous people themselves conceptualise health. There was no separate term in Indigenous languages for health as it is understood in western society . The traditional Indigenous perspective of health is holistic. It encompasses everything important in a person's life, including land, environment, physical body, community, relationships, and law. Health is the social, emotional, and cultural wellbeing of the whole community and the concept is therefore linked to the sense of being Indigenous. This conceptualisation of health has much in common with the social determinants model and has crucial implications for the simple application of biomedically-derived concepts as a means of improving Indigenous health. The reductionist, biomedical approach is undoubtedly useful in identifying and reducing disease in individuals, but its limitations in addressing population-wide health disadvantages, such as those experienced by Indigenous people, must be recognised.
In recent years there has been a marked shift in the rhetoric and the use of language to describe the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a range of areas including health. It is now widely recognised that there is a need to shift from ‘deficit’ thinking to more strengths-based approaches. In response to calls from the community many authoritative institutions and organisations have made public commitments to promote strengths based approaches in the public discourse on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander issues . For example the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2013-2023 defines a strengths based approach:
Similarly the Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage report (2014) declares a ‘greater focus on strengths-based reporting with a reframing from “overcoming disadvantage" to “improving wellbeing"’ (, p.94). The report also offers some relatively simple actions that have the capacity to shift the narrative in published materials from a deficit focus to a strengths focus including:
Shifting from a deficit to a strengths based approach has the capacity to:
In this edition of the Overview we have adapted the recommendations from the Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage report to ensure that we infuse the Overview with an enhanced strength based narrative form and structure. Changes include:
In subsequent publications we will be working with HealthInfoNet partners, consultants, and community stakeholder to identify and report on strengths-based indicators such as those identified in the Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage report and others.
It is important to note that the HealthInfoNet has an obligation to report honestly and openly on the evidence base for negative health outcomes. Access to and availability of the data are crucial to a full appreciation of the health impacts for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Nevertheless, as noted above, strengths-based reporting offers numerous benefits for workers in the sector.
The key measures in these areas for Indigenous people nationally include:
According to the 2011 Australian Census :
An ABS school report  revealed, in 2013:
The 2013 national report on schooling in Australia  showed:
According to the 2011 Australian Census :
The median real equivalised gross weekly household income for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander households in 2011-13 was $465 compared with $869 for non-Indigenous households .
ABS projections from the 2011 Census of the numbers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people suggest an Indigenous population of 713,600 people at 30 June 2014 , this was 3% of the projected total population of 23.5 million . The projection for NSW is the highest (220,902 Indigenous people), followed by Qld (203,045), WA (93,778), and the NT (72,251) (Table 1). The NT has the highest proportion of Indigenous people among its population (29.7%) and Vic the lowest (0.9%).
|Jurisdiction||Indigenous population (number)||Proportion of Australian Indigenous population (%)||Proportion of jurisdiction population (%)|
|Source: ABS, 2014 |
There was a 21% increase in the number of Indigenous people counted in the 2011 Census compared with the 2006 Census .2 The largest increases were in the ACT (34%), Vic (26%), NSW (25%) and Qld (22%) . For all jurisdictions, the 55 years and over age-group showed the largest relative increase (i.e. the Indigenous population is ageing) . There are a number of 'structural' reasons contributing to the growth of the Indigenous population:
Three other factors are considered likely to have contributed to the increase in the Indigenous population in the 2011 Census:
In 2011, about 35% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (233,000 people) lived in major cities, 22% (148,00 people) lived in inner regional areas, and 22% (146,000) lived in outer regional areas . About 8% (50,000 people) lived in remote areas and 14% (92,000) lived in very remote areas. Almost 90% of non-Indigenous people (over 19 million people) lived in major cities or inner regions.
In terms of specific geographical areas, more than one-half (53%) of all Indigenous people counted in the 2011 Census lived in nine of the 57 Indigenous regions . The three largest regions were in eastern Australia (Brisbane, NSW Central and the North Coast, and Sydney-Wollongong), which accounted for 29% of the total Indigenous population.
According to the 2011 Census, around 90% of Indigenous people are Aboriginal, 6% are Torres Strait Islanders, and 4% people identified as being of both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent . Around 63% of Torres Strait Islander people3 lived in Qld; NSW was the only other state with a large number of Torres Strait Islander people.
The Indigenous population is much younger overall than the non-Indigenous population (Figure 1) . According to estimates from the 2011 Census, at 30 June 2011 about 36% Indigenous people were aged less than 15 years, compared with 18% of non-Indigenous people. About 3.4% of Indigenous people were aged 65 years or over, compared with 14% of non-Indigenous people .
Figure 1. Population pyramid of Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations, 30 June 2011
Source: ABS, 2012